We route by the question, not by who is asking. Find the shape of your problem below — whatever brings you here.
Any of these can be commissioned as a single question or scoped as a full project. The category decides how the work is tasked; the scale decides what it costs. See engagements and pricing.
Run your own study on the platform, or bring us into the research team.
Most research on Enigmatic Insights is run by the researchers themselves. You design the study, bring and task your own participants, and use the platform to collect sessions, manage judging and produce the analysis — we do not need to be part of the design. Where you do want us, Enigmatic Technologies can be written into a proposal as co-researcher, advisor or analysis team, and for some studies the platform itself can be tailored to what your protocol needs.
Name us in your grant proposal as co-researcher, advisor or analysis team, or simply use the platform to run the study yourselves. For some studies we can adapt the platform to the way your protocol works.
You can run your own study on the platform and bring your own participants. We can also be named in your funding application alongside you.
Once you design and run your project, the platform drafts the statistics and analytics for you to review and revise, so you start from a worked analysis rather than a blank page.
Why us. Tasking, session records, judging and statistics live in one place, so every number traces back to the sessions that produced it and nothing has to be reconstructed by hand after the fact. Two externally funded studies are running on the platform now.
How this usually runs. Most research runs on the platform rather than as a commission. When we are commissioned, it is as a project, or as a standing arrangement for a study that runs over several years — rarely as a single session.
Narrowing the search for people, objects, sites and resources when conventional methods have stalled.
Missing persons, lost items, geological features, archaeological sites and items, hidden sites, and biological, mineral and plant targets. Different objects, one task.
Please contact us. We work alongside law enforcement rather than around them, and we partner with non-profits and professional groups so that you get the most comprehensive help available. Ask us what it costs; we would rather have the conversation than have you assume.
Material is handled confidentially, findings are labeled as exploratory, and nothing we produce identifies a person as responsible for anything.
Mutual NDA as standard, a defined deliverable format, and impressions matched to coordinates.
Why us. Geo-matching turns a description into a place. Two viewers working independently means the output is a narrowed area with a stated confidence, not a single point asserted as fact.
How this usually runs. Both paths genuinely apply here — a single question to narrow an area, or a project for full search support.
Technology foresight, emerging opportunities, future events and market movement.
How a technology will advance, what capability is emerging — including biological development — which future events are worth preparing for, and how a market may move.
This complements horizon scanning and scenario work rather than replacing it, and it is most useful where the scanning has nothing left to scan.
We do not provide financial or investment advice. We can provide information you take to your own certified advisors and planners.
Why us. Repeated tasking over time produces trends rather than one-off impressions, and the platform holds the history that makes a trend visible at all.
How this usually runs. Usually a project. A single bounded question can be commissioned on its own.
New directions for cold cases and investigations where the evidence is exhausted.
Cold cases and active investigations that have run out of leads. The output is directions worth investigating, never conclusions.
How material is handled and kept confidential, how viewers are kept ignorant of the case, how findings are labeled as exploratory, and our undertaking that nothing is framed as identifying a suspect.
You are encouraged to contact us. Where the work touches an open case we will want to work with the investigating agency, and we will explain how that normally goes.
Findings are exploratory. No person should be accused of wrongdoing on the basis of them, and independent follow-up is always advised.
Why us. Viewers work without being told the case, so impressions are not shaped by what is already assumed about it — which is the failure mode a stalled investigation is suffering from.
How this usually runs. Both paths. Agencies normally start with a scoping call.
Questions with little or no hard data, where verification may not be possible for some time.
Open-ended inquiry where there is little to no hard data and verification may not be possible any time soon — including anomalous phenomena, and the question of what you should be asking in the first place.
Verification may not be possible soon, or at all. This is for opening lines of inquiry, not settling them. If you need proof, this is not the thing to commission.
That is research. Start with the first category on this page.
Why us. If we are not the right people for a question, we will usually know who is, and we will say so.
How this usually runs. Usually a single session. A project for sustained exploration.
Send your name, your email and a rough sense of timing. That's all we need, and deliberately so: the less our team knows at the outset, the cleaner the work. A project manager will reply within three business days to arrange a short call, and your question gets shaped there — never in front of the viewers.
If it isn't a fit, we'll say so on that call and there's no charge for the conversation.
Prefer your own email? Write to contactET@enigmatictechnologies.dev
The same rule applies: your name and a rough sense of timing, no details yet.
Disclaimer. While enigmatic technologies, such as remote viewing, are powerful tools that often provide valuable information, they almost never yield results that are 100% accurate. Even when information produced by enigmatic methods is accurate, it may be incomplete or subject to misinterpretation. No person should be accused of wrongdoing or subject to defamatory allegations based on the information received by enigmatic methods. Where information produced and communicated raises an issue of interest or concern, follow-up investigations using independent methods are advised.